De La Torre A., Pires J., Huau C., Monziols M., Xavier C., Louis L., Le Cozler Y., Faverdin P., Lamberton P., Chery I., Heimo D., Lonckle C., Schmidely P., Lerch S.
In vivo estimation of body composition: comparison of eight methods in dairy goats.
In: 71th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science. 1st december, Hrsg. EAAP, Virtual Meeting. 2020, 202.
The objective was to test 8 methods for estimation of empty body lipid (EBL) and protein (EBP) mass in dairy
goats. The methods tested on 20 Alpine goats (3±0.6 years old; 226±9 DIM; 47 to 72 kg of BW) were: adipose cell
size; deuterium oxide dilution space (D2OS); 3-dimension (3D) imaging: whole body 3D-scan and automatic 3D
assessment of body condition score (3D-BCS); manual sternal and lumbar BCS and ultrasound imagery; computer
tomography and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Simple and multiple regressions (Proc GLM, SAS) were
tested between different variables and EBL and EBP mass measured by chemical analyses after slaughter. Perirenal
adipose tissue mass and cell diameter combined with BW provided the most accurate predictive equations for EBL
(R2=0.95, residual coefficient of variation, rCV=12%). Nonetheless, such predictors can only be measured postmortem.
The best equations for EBL derived from in vivo variables included BW combined with 1/ the volume of fatty
tissues measured by computer tomography (R2=0.92, rCV=17%), 2/ the D2OS (R2=0.91, rCV=19%), and 3/ the BIS
(R2=0.87, rCV=23%). D2OS combined with BW provided the best equation for EBP (R2=0.97, rCV=3%), whereas
BW alone provided a fair EBP estimate (R2=0.92, rCV=4%). Manual BCS combined with BW provided good EBL
and EBP estimations (R2=0.80 and 0.94, rCV=28 and 4%, respectively). BCS is a non-invasive technique and does
not require particular equipment, but it is subjective and prone to operator bias. Compared to manual BCS, 3D-BCS
combined with BW slightly decreased the accuracy of the predictive equation for EBL (R2=0.74, rCV=32%), and did
not improve the estimation of EBP compared with BW alone. Ultrasound and whole body 3D imaging techniques
were not satisfactory estimators of EBL and EBP (R2≤0.40).